background

MediaTek Dimensity 8450 vs Dimensity 8350: Benchmarks and Specs

The Dimensity 8450 is more powerful and efficient

Arjun Sha profile picture
by Arjun Sha
facebook iconfacebook icon
whatsapp iconwhatsapp icon
twitter icontwitter icon
Link Copied
copy link iconcopy link icon
dimensity 8450 vs dimensity 8350 benchmark comparison

Image Credit: Mohit Singh / Beebom Gadgets

Summary

  • In the AnTuTu benchmark, the Dimensity 8450 scored 1,645,212 while the Dimensity 8350 got 1,355,407 points.
  • As for Geekbench, the Dimensity 8450 achieved 6,268 in multi-core and the Dimensity 8350 scored 4,310.
  • Overall, the Dimensity 8450 is 45% faster in multi-core CPU performance and around 23% faster in graphics tasks.

Notes

We benchmarked the Dimensity 8450 on the Oppo Reno14 Pro, and the Dimensity 8350 on the OnePlus Nord CE5.

MediaTek's Dimensity 8450 is shaping up to be a great chip in the upper mid-range Android segment. It brings newer CPU cores, a more capable GPU, and overall, improved efficiency. But, how does it stack up against its predecessor, the Dimensity 8350? To answer that, we have compared the Dimensity 8450 and Dimensity 8350 across AnTuTu, Geekbench, 3DMark, and more. Now, let's go ahead and check out the benchmark results.

Dimensity 8450 vs Dimensity 8350: AnTuTu Score

AnTuTu Benchmark
Dimensity 8450
Dimensity 8350
AnTuTu Score
1,645,212
1,355,407
CPU
407,562
283,540
GPU
639,619
542,958
Memory
284,727
264,163
UX
313,304
264,746

In our first AnTuTu V10 benchmark, the Dimensity 8450 scored 1,645,212 points while the Dimensity 8350 achieved 1,355,407 points. Here, the Dimensity 8450, running on the Oppo Reno14 Pro is around 21% faster than the Dimensity 8350. In terms of GPU performance too, the difference is 17% and the CPU sees a substantial difference of 43%, which is amazing.

Dimensity 8450 vs Dimensity 8350: Geekbench Score

Geekbench 6 CPU
Dimensity 8450
Dimensity 8350
Single-core
1,603
1,385
Multi-core
6,268
4,310

Now, to judge the CPU performance, we ran the Geekbench 6 CPU test, and the Dimensity 8450 scored 1,603 in single-core and 6,268 in multi-core. The Dimensity 8350, running on the OnePlus Nord CE5, achieved 1,385 in single-core and 4,310 in multi-core.

Thanks to the newer Cortex-A725 CPU cores, the Dimensity 8450 enjoys 15% faster performance in single-core tasks and a whopping 45% better performance in multi-core tasks. The Cortex-A725 is also more power efficient than the Cortex-A715 core available inside the Dimensity 8350. So in terms of both performance and efficiency, the Dimensity 8450 has a much-improved CPU.

Dimensity 8450 vs Dimensity 8350: CPU Throttling Test

CPU Throttling Test
Dimensity 8450
Dimensity 8350
Maximum Score
264,702 GIPS
292,521 GIPS
Average Score
241,937 GIPS
271,459 GIPS
Minimum Score
193,232 GIPS
242,792 GIPS
Throttling Percentage (Higher is better)
77%
85%

Now, coming to the 15-minute CPU Throttling Test, the Dimensity 8450 throttled to 77% of its maximum performance while the Dimensity 8350 stood at 85%. On paper, the Dimensity 8350 looks slightly better, however, if you take a close look at the graph, both processors have done an impressive job at handling all-core CPU workloads under heavy stress. It means that you are going to get a responsive experience on both chipsets even when all CPU cores are engaged at their maximum clock speeds.

Dimensity 8450 vs Dimensity 8350: 3DMark Score

3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress Test
Dimensity 8450
Dimensity 8350
Best Loop Score
4,004
3,252
Lowest Loop Score
2,854
1,048
Stability
71.3%
32.2%

Next, we ran the 3DMark Wild Life Extreme Stress test to test the GPU on both processors. In this test, the Dimensity 8450 performed much better. The Arm Mali-G720 MC7 inside the Dimensity 8450 got the best score of 4,004 points and the lowest score of 2,854 with a great stability of 71.3%.

Meanwhile, the Dimensity 8350 received the best score of 3,252 and the lowest score of 1,048 with a dismal stability of 32.2%. It means that while the Dimensity 8450 is around 23% faster in graphics-intensive tasks, it's also much more stable in sustained performance. For prolonged gaming sessions, the Dimensity 8450 is a much better pick than the 8350.

3DMark Solar Bay
Dimensity 8450
Dimensity 8350
Overall Score
6,589
4,932
Average FPS
25.05 FPS
18.75 FPS

Moving to the 3DMark Solar Bay test which evaluates ray-tracing performance, here too, the Dimensity 8450 leads by a hefty margin. It scored 6,589 with 25.05FPS whereas the Dimensity 8350 got 4,932 with 18.75FPS. Overall, the Dimensity 8450 is 33% faster than the Dimensity 8450 in ray-traced games.

3DMark Steel Nomad Light
Dimensity 8450
Dimensity 8350
Overall Score
1,472
1,242

In the intensive 3DMark Steel Nomad Light test, the Dimensity 8450 scored 1,472 and the Dimensity 8350 achieved 1,242 points. In this GPU test as well, the Dimensity 8450 posts over 18% faster graphics performance. All in all, it's clear that the Dimensity 8450 is equipped with a stellar GPU that delivers on both performance and stability.

Dimensity 8450 vs Dimensity 8350: Speedometer 3.0 Score

In the Speedometer 3.0 benchmark which evaluates the processor on web responsiveness and fluidity, the Dimensity 8450 scored 13.9 points while the Dimensity 8350 got 9.66 points. In terms of web performance, the Dimensity 8450 is 44% faster which is quite huge. So, if you use web-heavy applications, I would certainly recommend the Dimensity 8450.

Dimensity 8450 vs Dimensity 8350: Benchmark Gallery

dimensity 8450 vs dimensity 8350 antutu benchmark
dimensity 8450 vs dimensity 8350 antutu benchmark
dimensity 8450 vs dimensity 8350 cpu throttling test
dimensity 8450 vs dimensity 8350 cpu throttling test
dimensity 8450 vs dimensity 8350 geekbench score
dimensity 8450 vs dimensity 8350 geekbench score
dimensity 8450 vs dimensity 8350 3dmark solar bay test
dimensity 8450 vs dimensity 8350 3dmark solar bay test
dimensity 8450 vs dimensity 8350 3dmark wild life extreme stress test
dimensity 8450 vs dimensity 8350 3dmark wild life extreme stress test
dimensity 8450 vs dimensity 8350  speedometer score
dimensity 8450 vs dimensity 8350  speedometer score
dimensity 8450 vs dimensity 8350 3dmark steel nomad light test
dimensity 8450 vs dimensity 8350 3dmark steel nomad light test

Dimensity 8450 vs Dimensity 8350: Specs Comparison

Specs
Dimensity 8450
Dimensity 8350
Process Node
TSMC’s 4nm
TSMC’s 4nm
CPU
8-core Arm Cortex CPU
8-core Arm Cortex CPU
CPU Cores
1x Cortex-A725 (3.25GHz), 3x Cortex-A725 (3.0GHz), 4x Cortex-A725 (2.1GHz)
1x Cortex-A715 (3.35GHz), 3x Cortex-A715 (3.20GHz), 4x Cortex-A510 (2.20GHz)
GPU
Arm Mali-G720 MC7
Arm Mali-G615 MC6
Storage and Memory
UFS 4.0, LPDDR5X memory, up to 8533Mbps
UFS 4.0, LPDDR5X memory, up to 8533Mbps
NPU
MediaTek NPU 880
MediaTek NPU 780
ISP
Imagiq 1080, Up to 320MP image, 4K60 video
Imagiq 980, Up to 320MP image, 4K60 video
Modem
MediaTek 5G R16 modem, Up to 5.17Gbps peak download speed
MediaTek 5G R16 modem, Up to 5.17Gbps peak download speed
Connectivity
Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.4
Wi-Fi 6E, Bluetooth 5.4

Verdict

To sum up, the Dimensity 8450 is a great upper mid-range chipset, and beats the Dimensity 8350 by a substantial margin. In multi-core CPU performance, the Dimensity 8450 leads by a whopping 45% and the GPU is around 23% faster while maintaining solid thermal stability. I would definitely opt for the Dimensity 8450 as it brings the newer Cortex-A725 CPU core.

In fact, in my comparison between the Dimensity 8450 and Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, I found that the former comes quite close in some departments which is impressive. So, if you are a regular user or a gamer, the Dimensity 8450 is highly recommended in the upper mid-range segment.

Arjun Sha profile picture
Arjun Sha

Senior Guides Writer

Arjun has been covering Windows, AI, chipsets, and online privacy at Beebom for six years. He simplifies complex technological concepts for a wider audience and tries to solve everyday computing problems. While he's not writing, you will find him on Twitter following the latest developments in AI.

linkedin iconlinkedin icon
twitter X icontwitter X icon
email iconemail icon