Apple Just Escalated Its Legal Fight with OpenAI

Apple says OpenAI has violated court rules for submitting a 9-page filing instead of 5-page limit for objections

Abubakar Mohammed profile pictureby Abubakar Mohammed
Link Copied
copy link iconcopy link icon
OpenAI and Apple logos on a phone and a monotor

Image Credit: daily_creativity/ Shutterstock

Summary

  • Apple has accused OpenAI of violating court rules by sneaking new arguments and testimony into an evidence objection.
  • The dispute targets Apple employee Chang Liu, who is attempting to justify wiping his corporate Mac Mini.
  • Both are battling over a preliminary injunction, with a hearing set for October 14, 2026.
Click Here to Add Beebom Gadgets As A Trusted SourceGoogleAdd as a preferred source on Google

The ongoing legal battle between OpenAI and Apple keeps getting increasingly hostile. Just days after OpenAI accused Apple of improperly slipping new evidence into the case, Apple has fired back with a brutal counterattack.

Apple Accuses OpenAI of Breaking Court Rules with Its Latest Filing

According to a recent filing by Apple, the Cupertino giant says OpenAI didn't object to the evidence but completely ignored court guidelines by attempting to secretly retry the entire motion. Apple's primary target appears to be its ex-employee Chang Liu, who now works for OpenAI.

Apple's latest plantiff against OpenAi
Apple's latest plantiff against OpenAi

For those unaware, Apple originally sued OpenAI and Chang Liu for stealing trade secrets and using them in upcoming products. Chang Liu submitted his eight-paragraph declaration where he tried to justify that he completely wiped his Apple-issued Mac Mini before returning it.

However, Apple has completely blasted the claims as an "egregious overreach". The company argues that OpenAI’s 9-page filing violates the court's strict 5-page limit for objections. Additionally, Apple points out that court regulations explicitly forbid using a simple evidence objection to introduce new defensive arguments. The company labelled them as mere excuses, as OpenAI has no convincing proof.

Apple document openAI
Apple document openAI

Regardless of the document's length, Apple is asking the court to leave everything on the table. Because OpenAI already submitted what Apple claims is a functionally illegal "sur-reply," the brand argues the judge should review the full, unfiltered record. This should also include Apple's original evidence in OpenAI's trade secrets allegation when deciding the injunction.

For those who've barely had time to catch their breath following the latest tech launches, let alone keep up with this legal dispute, here's a simplified timeline of how things have unfolded and what to expect next:

Lawsuit TimelineAction
The CatalystApple files injunction to halt OpenAI's hardware integration
OpenAI's MoveAccuses Apple of adding new evidence. Submits Liu's defense
Apple's StrikeCalls out rule violations; demands the court review all files
Next HearingOctober 14, 2026

While it's hard to say which firm will come out victorious, it does seem like Apple has the upper hand here. If the October 14, 2026 hearing goes Apple's way, it could severely handicap OpenAI's hardware ambitions.

This will add further pressure on the leadership of the firm, considering OpenAI's IPO has been delayed, and the company is seeking another $80 billion dollars from private investors. OpenAI has yet to see net profits and still continues to bear humongous losses. More information should be revealed soon, so stay tuned.

Related Articles

Recommended For You